The Revelation Effect

What Is The Revelation Effect

The first obstacle to overcome in any discussion is the definition of the terms. The reason is the natural ability of the spirit of discovery and the process of truth. The revelation is the revelation of the truth, because God, who otherwise may not be revealed by the forces of human reason without supernatural assistance. We must examine and assess the five positions of the relationship of the revelation to the senses. The only revelation Søren Kierkegaard argued that, because the man fell, and in a State of rebellion and the isolation of God, he can understand the truth of God without the revelation. God is transcendent. Like that, higher than our thoughts (Isaiah 55:9) are higher than our ways his ways and his thoughts. (Romans 11.33) God's ways are past to discover. God is completely on the man and try to understand the truth of God with the capacity of human reasoning, is useless. God is not irrational but Suprarational and more control or testability of human reason. In addition, given that the reason can only but not the positive effects on the discovery of the rejection of truth divine, absurd or irrational. We must make a leap of faith beyond rationality, who believe in divine revelation. For this reason, any attempt is evidence for the existence of God to provide an insult to God. It is not necessary to ensure the confidence and those who believe not convinced. Is this the truth comes from God and must be disclosed to people by all means. However, it seems inadequate, do not allow men to discover their spirit given by God and to look at the truth of God. Humanity is more like a team, which will only process the data that can be entered. We are made in the image of God, includes the ability to reason. Deny this essential aspect of our humanity in the image of God in us to refuse. God gave us a spirit for single use only. Although our minds not conflicted with the revelation of God to be used, must use our minds to understand. The reason is that only this view States that he discovered none of the divine revelation, but are all the truths of human reason. Immanuel Kant argued that this point of view. According to him, that we filter the script by reason. This required his denial of miracles, demonic possession, the resurrection of Christ, etc., this vision is good, as it insists on the need for people using God, in his opinion the truth of the universe, God has created to discover and uncover the truth about God. It is however very lack, because human reason unaided by divine revelation is limited. On the effect of Sin on our capacity to reason, truth, there are many things that might not always known in addition to the revelation. Do not know the resurrection or the future Kingdom of God apart from divine revelation of Jésus Christ. Human reason could never discover these truths. Reason is important cause says on revelation, reason, and revelation of the meaning to the life of the believer, but the reason on revelation, the revelation is given. Justin Martyr says that those who lived were reasonably Christians, if they do not believe in Christ. Based on the idea that all truth is God's truth, Justin considers the Greek philosophers were Christians, because their reasoning the truth led to the discovery of God. Clement of Alexandria against the Greek philosophy of Halakha. He said that the two lead to Christ. 17th and 18th century deists argued, that this point of view. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson was the Bible literally cut the printed Bible any supernatural event and the rest as Jefferson. On the revelation comes to the conclusion that, if the biblical doctrine rightly be rejected are not aligned. The best example of modern those close to reason about the revelation of the higher criticism of the Bible, which is determined by the reason that the parts of the book are really the revelation of God to man and not. The truth of this point of view is the fact that the revelation to be explored by human reason. We studied the revelation not, to determine if it is in fact a revelation, but to understand, to understand and apply this revelation in our lives. This view is weak, because it can lead to the idea that human reason can decide if a revelation, such as the resurrection of Christ and the miracles in general; Revelation on the reason Tertullian said: I believe because it is absurd. It does not, which makes no sense. The Latin term translated absurd stupidity. He was not against reason, he spoke against those who are satisfied believed simply themselves, without a thorough examination of the reasons for the tradition that it was assumed. But their comments show the superiority, the revelation about its ability to reason, owned by the revelation and give meaning to the human spirit. Cornelius Van Til, said that depends on the reason of the Apocalypse. Too many Christians on Earth God because instead of reason to God. God is the creator which humanity, so quite rightly should be his servant. But is never due under the judgment of God on the punishment of God. This opinion is correct in the ontological sense. The revelation is ontologically. Until you on revelation and reason of truth is not possible, they must know. In any case you can think of something you don't know. In addition to Dios, the revelation is human nature reason fall naturally need to fail. God is bigger than everything, including human reason. The weakness of this point of view, is that it tends to human reason, see often underestimate him as an enemy of God. And gives insufficient attention to the reason of man as a part of the image of God in us and it is something that must be used in its entirety, but within the limits of the revelation. Revelation and reason Agustín argues that a revelation, but never can think of against him. Christian should strive, which naturally is credible. He said, I understand, is God, the Passo s. without believing that you don't ever come to a full understanding of the truth. It is based on the reading of the Septuagint of Isaiah 7:9 which says: If you don't believe me, you do not understand. It was also the fact that no one believes without previously an idea of what it is to believe. No one should believe a revelation that has not tried first for the credible reason. Taught Agustín who believe understanding is rewarded. Since you accept the revelation of God, was rewarded with a full understanding of what would otherwise be. A partial understanding is to know the reason for believing but believing, come to a more comprehensive understanding required. Ultimately, the man must accept by faith, which can be proven by the reason and because they cannot. Thomas Aquinas believed in the total depravity of man, but he still believes that our human reason is not completely destroyed. If it was totally destroyed, so he reasoned, already be kept us not capable of sinning, or at least for our sins. The best of what can be done by us, is to prove that God exists, but divine revelation is the only basis for belief in God. Reason led to our conviction that something is true, while the revelation is the only basis for believing in the truth. Said writing that the demons believe God exists, but does not believe in God (James 02.19). Even if one believe in God, why can't it find the reasons of this. The believer is adequate support for their faith in historical and experimental evidence and wonder and philosophy. Before thinking correctly is philosophically, has offered that no evidence of the existence of God is non-Christian. However, it is fair to believe personally; for a God or in his so-called Word does not believe when you have no evidence that it is true. Force this vision lies in the importance given to the proper reason and revelation to realize that everyone together working for Christian truth and understanding. There is no reason that the concept of faith in a simple confession is despised or attachment dogmatic to a list of non-Inteligiblehechos if we talk about revelation can really understand and will then only, we are really believe in revelation. See the conclusion, that God has the capacity to reason and we are made in his image, it follows that God uses our ability, reasoning, to discover and behold, the truth has been designed. However, several truths can come only by revelation. Revelation and reason cannot be separated from the life of the Christian. Only, that we can leave no reason for our lives for the benefit of the revelation is clear that proponents of a single vision of revelation should be logical and reasonable arguments for their position. They appeal to our argument to show that their opinion is correct. On the flip side any attempt by pure rationalism is divorced also unnecessary revelation, because not everything can be proven. It is always provided or simply believes that behind every provable think. Justification of the right has got to go somewhere. In the epistemological sense, the reason is the discovery, given that the reason must be used to check if the Bible without a doubt is the revelation. Why are think as a means to know the existence of God. You can should disbelieve in God, does not know and actually do know, be something without thinking of what is known. A certain degree of knowledge (and why) if God must be aware, if you believe it, save or worlds. You know without faith, you have may not believe, but without knowing. Reason and revelation work together. God gives you believe at the same time with our understanding. We believe that our mind not crucify. Faith can sometimes our ability to know something beyond, or how, but the belief is not illogical. Healing seems illogical, but we know the word of God (Revelation) than cure, and then you can believe (wrongly) that it will heal. Other notice also revelation and reason produce logical complications to the rescue. The idea that you can move only in the faith to understand and understand faith never lack of adequate support. Michael Bauman said. His most famous statements heard, what has Athens as part of Jerusalem? What harmony is there between the Academy and the Church? Greek philosophy has complained and the reasoning, God's revelation once rejected, said s. is it believe can give, if the wonderful be a reason why they do not believe it. This perspective argues that the faithful of the revelation, but against them reasons never. Kant held that revelation within the limits of reason, but the reason within the revelation of Tertullian. Sends chills and thorns to get, because it seems that they unlike the belief and wonderful. We invite other Christians to reason and treat it as use a gift of God in its entirety. The fact is that different Christian views on the relationship between reason and revelation. Some completely eliminate an or their system of beliefs, others others tend to be more to tend to one another, while other two equal emphasis on the handle. We have various positions as a unique, revelation of the revelation, the only reason over reason, reason for the Apocalypse or revelation and reason. Reason is necessarily bound by revelation is evidenced by the fact that we are called to decide the true revelation of false revelation (try the spirits by Giovanni 4: 1-2). How is it so demanding that all reason, even if there is reasoning from the Scriptures? Do not forget that there is a difference between the reasoning to see if some revelation, or to determine what is the revelation of the Bible. The first is a noble effort (APG 17.11), while the second does not. Faith is blind and except if unworthy, a revelation, the test or not. What do you think about the nonsense without the fundamental band credibility or accuracy to prove, but it is assuming that everything from the beginning must be accepted until they are adopted, it the word of God or the truth is too arrogant. Part of the tension can be solved by clicking on the topic from two different angles: connotations (we know) and ontologically (as we know). There's a difference between how we know reality, and what do we know of reality. God is the source of all truth, truth at the top should be down and by revelation known. However, a connotation of bottom up determines start if Dios. For the reasons previously the revelation and reason, gifts of God to the people know are and understand the truth and then know and understand God of all truth. Rejection of revelation or Bajo Énfasis in every aspect and the reason we are part of the team that gave us God, to know him is put at disposal. Increase our understanding of God and the intellectual means for us gnomes. Is how to close one aspect or the other cuts with scissors with only a sheet. Is how to reduce something to another with a dull pair of haircutting scissors. We can directly cut the truth only focusing on revelation and reason. ,,.